If you dont stop nuke developments... no ipods for U! Options
Splinter
#1 Posted: : Wednesday, November 29, 2006 10:58:22 AM
Rank: Administration



Groups: Registered User, Server Admin

Joined: 9/7/2006
Posts: 3,054
Points: 1,377
Location: Abbotsford British Columbia, Canada
US wants to stop luxury shipments to Korea like ipods, plasma tv's and other fancy shit just cause Kim Jong likes them. How fucking weak is that?

ahhhh_crap wrote:
no, splinter has ethics and whut has emotions
Filliam H. Muffman
#2 Posted: : Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:07:14 AM
Rank: Jimmy Hat Jester


Groups: {pDs} Member, Newsie, Server Admin

Joined: 5/16/2006
Posts: 1,796
Points: 81
Location: Dallas
Thats pretty fucking weak. I'm sick of passive US foreign policy. However, I strongly believe that if we were not spread thin in Iraq, we would be taking a much more aggressive stance on North Korea.
get your ass to mars
MakeSureItsCharcoalGrilled
#3 Posted: : Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:23:40 AM
Rank: Medium-Well


Groups: Registered User

Joined: 5/9/2006
Posts: 2,411
Points: -2
Location: the bottom of the bottle...
Filliam H. Muffman wrote:
Thats pretty fucking weak. I'm sick of passive US foreign policy. However, I strongly believe that if we were not spread thin in Iraq, we would be taking a much more aggressive stance on North Korea.


no ye wouldn't. even though N.Korea may have a nuke, they don't have the ability to denotate anywhere near the U.S., and seeing as there is no oil to be had in North Korea, the U.S. would see no point in invading.

and U.S. foreign policy is not "passive". it's just plain retarded and greedy.

If you guys actually cared about Human rights, democray and shit ye would have gone into Sudan instead of Iraq when there was all that shit going on. But ye didn't want to. My guess is that becuase Sudan is currently an oil producing nation and they didn't want to effect current oil output in any negative fashion. So they went into Iraq to expand oil production (as well as de-nationalise it).
yeah, i'm a cranky 'oul fucker. deal with it.
Crass
#4 Posted: : Wednesday, November 29, 2006 1:16:38 PM
Rank: Fecal Impaction For the Win!


Groups: {pDs} Member

Joined: 6/8/2006
Posts: 1,525
Points: 9
Location: US

Actualy, I know im gona be the outkast on this one but i think it is a good plan. It has worked before in history, maybe not with more important items but it could still have an effect. This man is a basterd, who knows what he will do for his own benefit? I mean realy ever sience he has been in power he has deprived his people and based all decisions off of what he finds beneficial to the upper class a.k.a. Him


FREE TONY!


Rofl I win!
Splinter
#5 Posted: : Wednesday, November 29, 2006 2:52:17 PM
Rank: Administration



Groups: Registered User, Server Admin

Joined: 9/7/2006
Posts: 3,054
Points: 1,377
Location: Abbotsford British Columbia, Canada
Crass wrote:

Actualy, I know im gona be the outkast on this one but i think it is a good plan. It has worked before in history, maybe not with more important items but it could still have an effect. This man is a basterd, who knows what he will do for his own benefit? I mean realy ever sience he has been in power he has deprived his people and based all decisions off of what he finds beneficial to the upper class a.k.a. Him



What you should be asking more is how many friggin ipods does one person need

ahhhh_crap wrote:
no, splinter has ethics and whut has emotions
Crass
#6 Posted: : Wednesday, November 29, 2006 4:23:33 PM
Rank: Fecal Impaction For the Win!


Groups: {pDs} Member

Joined: 6/8/2006
Posts: 1,525
Points: 9
Location: US
Thats true, i understand hes a pretty raged individual, may need backups. Just a thought.

FREE TONY!


Rofl I win!
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.