32-bit OS or 64-bit OS Options
Drakhen
#1 Posted: : Thursday, May 08, 2008 2:12:33 PM
Rank: Administration



Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User, Server Admin

Joined: 5/6/2008
Posts: 166
Points: 324
Location: Milwaukee
Just wanted to know what you guys think stay with the 32-bit or jump up to the 64-bit OS
{pDs} Muffalopadus [DI]: I'm running around throwing dildos at people naked while riding a unicicle


Well, Star Wars Galaxies got into a massive head on collision with a truck carrying gasoline, causing a massive explosion.
Star Wars Galaxies was then taken from the wreckage, raped, and beat the **** out of. It is now in a comatose, charred state, while on life support.

{pDs} TERMINATORâ„¢
#2 Posted: : Thursday, May 08, 2008 2:34:10 PM
Rank: Fuckstick



Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User, Server Admin

Joined: 5/10/2006
Posts: 1,287
Points: 348
Location: United Kingdom

Good question

Which I don't know what the answer is

I would like too know what is better about 64Bit than 32bit?



Quote:
Posting related image due to my inability to formulate an intelligent response.

BlooDz wrote:
i cant type good im stupid
Lead Salad
#3 Posted: : Thursday, May 08, 2008 3:36:01 PM
Rank: Taco Technician



Groups: Registered User, {pDs} Member

Joined: 5/9/2006
Posts: 3,948
Points: 3,636
Location: Hi-Five City
go 64 as long as you feel like spending the extra money or you can get around that somehow.
Giller [GwDR]
#4 Posted: : Thursday, May 08, 2008 4:41:49 PM
Rank: Fecal Impaction For the Win!



Groups: Registered User, Server Admin

Joined: 1/13/2008
Posts: 1,509
Points: 2,004

Unless you are running a server, why spend the extra money.   Plus you ahve to deal with windows vista unless you dont mind running a NT window OS.  I dont think it's going to give you a significant advantage in gaming...if you are doing other system intensive things...well it just depends...but if you are like most ppl and just push your computer for gaming, well I don't think its that big of a deal.  Other ppl might disagree...im sure TF2 loads .003 seconds faster or some shit, but is that worth the cost of 64 bit vista (if you are buying it) or is it worth actually using vista (which sucks...even if its pirated)


Quote:

"Who the fuck is Leon Switch and why does he know we have a dog?" - Mrs. Giller
Deux
#5 Posted: : Thursday, May 08, 2008 6:40:30 PM
Rank: You're gonna stick that where?


Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User

Joined: 4/2/2008
Posts: 149
Points: 27
Location: Chicago
All but my main gaming computer run XP pro 64 or OS X. I haven't found any driver compatibility problems yet. I have a MSDN license so it doesn't cost me anything extra though. The only reason I haven't switch my main over yet is that I am too lazy to reinstall without a good reason like swapping motherboards. 64-bit has an advantage for me because almost all of my computers run WCG, a distributed computing application, 24/7. IMO if you are buying a new OS go 64 even if it is just for the ability to address 4 gb of ram.



Lead Salad
#6 Posted: : Thursday, May 08, 2008 7:19:50 PM
Rank: Taco Technician



Groups: Registered User, {pDs} Member

Joined: 5/9/2006
Posts: 3,948
Points: 3,636
Location: Hi-Five City
Giller [GwDR wrote:
]

Unless you are running a server, why spend the extra money.   Plus you ahve to deal with windows vista unless you dont mind running a NT window OS.  I dont think it's going to give you a significant advantage in gaming...if you are doing other system intensive things...well it just depends...but if you are like most ppl and just push your computer for gaming, well I don't think its that big of a deal.  Other ppl might disagree...im sure TF2 loads .003 seconds faster or some shit, but is that worth the cost of 64 bit vista (if you are buying it) or is it worth actually using vista (which sucks...even if its pirated)



IIRC dx10 is only available on 64-bit systems
MakeSureItsCharcoalGrilled
#7 Posted: : Thursday, May 08, 2008 7:33:55 PM
Rank: Medium-Well


Groups: Registered User

Joined: 5/9/2006
Posts: 2,411
Points: -2
Location: the bottom of the bottle...
Lead Salad wrote:


IIRC dx10 is only available on 64-bit systems


news to me. Vista32bit runs it fine i hear... the only issue is the RAM cap, which is more a long term concern unless you're doing serious graphic design shit.
yeah, i'm a cranky 'oul fucker. deal with it.
Deux
#8 Posted: : Thursday, May 08, 2008 8:18:16 PM
Rank: You're gonna stick that where?


Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User

Joined: 4/2/2008
Posts: 149
Points: 27
Location: Chicago
Nope, DX10 is fine on 32-bit vista. The thing to remember is that you need home premium or better for DX10, it's not in Home Basic IIRC.



Lead Salad
#9 Posted: : Thursday, May 08, 2008 11:10:22 PM
Rank: Taco Technician



Groups: Registered User, {pDs} Member

Joined: 5/9/2006
Posts: 3,948
Points: 3,636
Location: Hi-Five City
Oh, ok.
WarMachine
#10 Posted: : Friday, May 09, 2008 12:20:11 AM
Rank: You're gonna stick that where?

Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User, Server Admin

Joined: 11/15/2007
Posts: 474
Points: 447
Location: San Diego

MakeSureItsCharcoalGrilled wrote:
Lead Salad wrote:


IIRC dx10 is only available on 64-bit systems


news to me. Vista32bit runs it fine i hear... the only issue is the RAM cap, which is more a long term concern unless you're doing serious graphic design shit.

There is already an update that fixes the ram recognition of Vista 32.

I was having problems with it only see in 3G when in fact I had 4G... But now it recognizes all 4G.



Drakhen
#11 Posted: : Friday, May 09, 2008 3:18:55 AM
Rank: Administration



Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User, Server Admin

Joined: 5/6/2008
Posts: 166
Points: 324
Location: Milwaukee

Thanks for the info just to have more than 3 GB of ram might be worth it, but going to Vista i will try to avoid that.

XP PRO 64-bit if i can find it. Anyone know where to get it

{pDs} Muffalopadus [DI]: I'm running around throwing dildos at people naked while riding a unicicle


Well, Star Wars Galaxies got into a massive head on collision with a truck carrying gasoline, causing a massive explosion.
Star Wars Galaxies was then taken from the wreckage, raped, and beat the **** out of. It is now in a comatose, charred state, while on life support.

delta62
#12 Posted: : Friday, May 09, 2008 3:34:17 PM
Rank: Fuckstick

Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User

Joined: 1/2/2008
Posts: 750
Points: 66
Location: Olympia, WA
WarMachine wrote:

MakeSureItsCharcoalGrilled wrote:
Lead Salad wrote:


IIRC dx10 is only available on 64-bit systems


news to me. Vista32bit runs it fine i hear... the only issue is the RAM cap, which is more a long term concern unless you're doing serious graphic design shit.

There is already an update that fixes the ram recognition of Vista 32.

I was having problems with it only see in 3G when in fact I had 4G... But now it recognizes all 4G.

The RAM issue on 32 bit vista (or 32 bit anything, for that matter) is that 4GB is the maximum amount of memory you can ever utilize. So if you have 8GB RAM, bet 64 bit. Otherwise, you probably don't need it.

TEAM APARTMENT: No one rocks quite as hard as we do.
Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart wrote:
the flying spaghetti monster skullfucked Bob's corpse.

Lead Salad wrote:
My ePenis is 10 feet long!

WDF wrote:
A pair in douchbaggery.

TerribleNate
#13 Posted: : Friday, May 09, 2008 3:40:36 PM
Rank: Fuckstick


Groups: {pDs} Member, Server Admin

Joined: 5/10/2006
Posts: 777
Points: 24
http://www.newegg.com/Pr...16&name=Professional
Not The Face wrote:
nate burn in hell asswipe

Lead Salad wrote:
And he promises to beat up any suspicious negroes and their children as well.


Sirus touched me in my private message.
Rikaelus
#14 Posted: : Saturday, May 10, 2008 5:59:10 PM
Rank: Administration



Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User, Server Admin, Administration

Joined: 3/27/2008
Posts: 1,793
Points: 3,380
Location: Arizona
I'm honestly not understanding the anti-Vista argument anymore. I mean.. it sucks in general because it's Microsoft, but compared to XP, I don't see XP having any advantage. I just upgraded to Vista Ultimate 64-bit and a 8800 video card (which isn't that expensive) and I'm running Crysis at 1920x1200, high settings, and it runs perfectly smooth.

If it can do that... I don't get what the issue is.

delta62
#15 Posted: : Saturday, May 10, 2008 9:07:34 PM
Rank: Fuckstick

Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User

Joined: 1/2/2008
Posts: 750
Points: 66
Location: Olympia, WA

Rikaelus wrote:
I'm honestly not understanding the anti-Vista argument anymore. I mean.. it sucks in general because it's Microsoft, but compared to XP, I don't see XP having any advantage. I just upgraded to Vista Ultimate 64-bit and a 8800 video card (which isn't that expensive) and I'm running Crysis at 1920x1200, high settings, and it runs perfectly smooth.

If it can do that... I don't get what the issue is.

This is what people should think like. I've been running Vista since the day it came out. I get less error messages than XP, and I've never, never never found any bugs or driver incompatibility. Throw your 13 year old deskjet away.

For all the Mac users, OS 10.5 requires about the same system specs as Vista. OS 10.5 is not bad. The 2 take more power, because as technology advances, so do the hardware requirements.

And @ Terminator: 64 bit Operating system basically means faster computer, and more memory if you want it.

TEAM APARTMENT: No one rocks quite as hard as we do.
Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart wrote:
the flying spaghetti monster skullfucked Bob's corpse.

Lead Salad wrote:
My ePenis is 10 feet long!

WDF wrote:
A pair in douchbaggery.

Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.