Van Jones Options
endyss
#1 Posted: : Saturday, September 05, 2009 9:13:49 AM
Rank: Administration



Groups: Administration, Newsie, Registered User, Server Admin

Joined: 11/6/2007
Posts: 987
Points: 783
HolyJaw
#2 Posted: : Sunday, September 06, 2009 12:57:37 AM
Rank: Fecal Impaction For the Win!

Groups: Ogamer, Registered User

Joined: 5/9/2006
Posts: 1,666
Points: 2,478
Location: La Habra, Orange, CA
Fuck you; Republicans are assholes.

(I'll be back later after I manage to read all those articles. Sheesh, go back to WoW... hahaha)
silverwasp wrote:
Be careful what you wish for... I have 10 younger siblings and I am only 20....

Yes.... Same parents


WarMachine wrote:
meh...maybe if he hadn't been handed a burning house he could have done great things, but right now he has won the Prize for what? Damage Control?
Muffalopadus
#3 Posted: : Sunday, September 06, 2009 8:00:21 PM
Rank: Administration



Groups: {pDs} Member, Server Admin, Administration

Joined: 6/18/2009
Posts: 1,422
Points: -25,484
Location: USA, Indiana
Umm...what argument? =\
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe. - Carl Sagan
My Backpack
Muffalopadus
#4 Posted: : Monday, September 07, 2009 7:53:59 AM
Rank: Administration



Groups: {pDs} Member, Server Admin, Administration

Joined: 6/18/2009
Posts: 1,422
Points: -25,484
Location: USA, Indiana
OMG I SEXTUPLE POSTED!
If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe. - Carl Sagan
My Backpack
ahhhh_crap
#5 Posted: : Monday, September 07, 2009 8:17:06 AM
Rank: Polio Power!



Groups: Registered User, Server Admin

Joined: 6/14/2008
Posts: 666
Points: 1,416
Location: San Diego
1st) Not all, but a vast majority of the well-known Republican pundits are indeed A-holes. I think A-hole is actually a rather un-fulfilling term for those such as Glenn Beck, Anne Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, et al. On this count, I believe Van Jones should have been given a reward for finally speaking up against the conservative BS. Republicans regularly throw mud, they make a pasttime of being the pissy sore loser and whine and play victim, even during the years they were in total control of the houses and the presidency. Here's someone finally stepping up and saying "By the way, you guys are actually totally fuckwads". I'm ok with this.

2nd) What's wrong with the truther movement? I won't argue if you bring up examples from the serious nutcases that are about some reptilian overlord or some BS, but if you want to discuss what actually hit the Pentagon (look up the amazing pentalawn video) or the clean collapse of world trade center towers 1 & 2, and even more misteriously Tower 7, only a very short time after the owner of the world trade center was denied an extreme insurance policy he was trying to take out, well, please, fill me in on these events. I'm a truther. I'm a truther in the respect that I don't believe that the actual truth has come out. What hit the pentagon was NOT a passenger plane. Tower 7 is the only steel-girdered structure in the entire history of mankind to have to be demolished because it caught fire. Look up what was housed in tower 7 and it gets even more mysterious. Towers 1 & 2 fell because the jet fuel caused the structural steel to collapse? Jet fuel can't attain the melting point requirement for that steel. Now I know I'm not some whizzbang genius like Glenn Beck, but I'm pretty sure if the oven doesn't get hot enough to bake a pie, I'm not going to be enjoying warm apple pie.
In relevency, Van Jones being part of a movement that was concerned with freedom of information is something that I believe to be a good thing for a public official. 9/11 truth to most means just finding out the whole story. It's not finding out that aliens were responsible like a few nutjobs say, it's just "hey, this aint true, that story is BS, what's the real truth? " For Van Jones to have been part of that movement doesn't bug me. Especially considering he's the F-in green czar, not the war secretary or something.


And muff, I'm ashamed, still
endyss
#6 Posted: : Monday, September 07, 2009 12:06:56 PM
Rank: Administration



Groups: Administration, Newsie, Registered User, Server Admin

Joined: 11/6/2007
Posts: 987
Points: 783
ahhhh_crap wrote:
1st) Not all, but a vast majority of the well-known Republican pundits are indeed A-holes. I think A-hole is actually a rather un-fulfilling term for those such as Glenn Beck, Anne Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, et al. On this count, I believe Van Jones should have been given a reward for finally speaking up against the conservative BS. Republicans regularly throw mud, they make a pasttime of being the pissy sore loser and whine and play victim, even during the years they were in total control of the houses and the presidency. Here's someone finally stepping up and saying "By the way, you guys are actually totally fuckwads". I'm ok with this.

2nd) What's wrong with the truther movement? I won't argue if you bring up examples from the serious nutcases that are about some reptilian overlord or some BS, but if you want to discuss what actually hit the Pentagon (look up the amazing pentalawn video) or the clean collapse of world trade center towers 1 & 2, and even more misteriously Tower 7, only a very short time after the owner of the world trade center was denied an extreme insurance policy he was trying to take out, well, please, fill me in on these events. I'm a truther. I'm a truther in the respect that I don't believe that the actual truth has come out. What hit the pentagon was NOT a passenger plane. Tower 7 is the only steel-girdered structure in the entire history of mankind to have to be demolished because it caught fire. Look up what was housed in tower 7 and it gets even more mysterious. Towers 1 & 2 fell because the jet fuel caused the structural steel to collapse? Jet fuel can't attain the melting point requirement for that steel. Now I know I'm not some whizzbang genius like Glenn Beck, but I'm pretty sure if the oven doesn't get hot enough to bake a pie, I'm not going to be enjoying warm apple pie.
In relevency, Van Jones being part of a movement that was concerned with freedom of information is something that I believe to be a good thing for a public official. 9/11 truth to most means just finding out the whole story. It's not finding out that aliens were responsible like a few nutjobs say, it's just "hey, this aint true, that story is BS, what's the real truth? " For Van Jones to have been part of that movement doesn't bug me. Especially considering he's the F-in green czar, not the war secretary or something.


And muff, I'm ashamed, still

I'm done.


HolyJaw wrote:
In the end, everything Endyss said.


virus
#7 Posted: : Monday, September 07, 2009 1:10:17 PM
Rank: Fuckstick



Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User

Joined: 1/14/2008
Posts: 984
Points: 1,856
Location: Michigan
"Contempt and insults engender hatred against those who indulge in them. without being of any advantage to them. - Niccoló Machiavelli, The Discourses. 1517. "

Regardless of who may or may not be an A--hole, he should have kept his counsel to himself. He was a drag on the administration team and now he's gone. Hopefully, he'll be replaced with someone more attuned to politics. You don't get anything done in government by calling the opposition names.
"I love the smell of napalm in the morning. Smells like ... victory"
Quote:
Lead Salad
#8 Posted: : Monday, September 07, 2009 6:43:27 PM
Rank: Taco Technician



Groups: Registered User, {pDs} Member

Joined: 5/9/2006
Posts: 3,948
Points: 3,636
Location: Hi-Five City
Machiavelli for the win
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.