|
|
Rank: Polio Power!

Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User
Joined: 8/1/2008 Posts: 658 Points: 81 Location: SoCal
|
Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart wrote:RichardAwesome wrote:Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart wrote:tpractice wrote:
I'm going to call you on this one Dick. Look at the number of Democrats that voted against this. If the Democrats really wanted this to pass, they could have done it anytime they wanted(they only needed about 12 more votes).
Democratic
140
95
Republican
65
133
1
Independent
205
228
1
Yeah, the deal going in was that it had to be bipartisan. If the Democrats wanted to they probably could of shaken an additional 12 votes, but by the time it became apparent that they were necessary it was clear that McCain failed to deliver his House faction there was no way out except to either own it or let it die. I think letting it die was obviously the better choice politically so I'm not surprised that's how it wound up, they are politicians and in the apportionment of blame the balance falls with the GOP for failing to deliver (they won serious concessions for their votes and fucking backed out) and with McCain for mucking the thing up by injecting the Prez campaign into an already delicate and messy situation. This thing is a big pile of shit, but at this point a bigtime bailout is the only way out and the only way to have a real bailout is if it is bipartisan. Until the McCain and the GOPers in the House get serious that's not going to happen. Failing to deliver? Look at how many Democrats said no. Are you bad at math? More Republicans voted no than Democrats. Additionally, of the congress people who made public comments from the floor only about 25% of the Democrats who spoke were against the bill, the rest argued for it. On the Republican side it was almost the opposite. Then vote time came and they threw McCain under the bus (after getting most of their stupid concessions, it's totally nuts!). Whatever deal gets worked out next isn't going to be substantively different unless the Democrats do something surprising, which considering what they have to work with and the seriousness of the crisis may be the only way out of this. If all democrats vote yes, this bill passes.
|
|
|
Rank: Coathanger Abortion

Groups: {pDs} Member, Server Admin
Joined: 5/17/2006 Posts: 3,487 Points: 1,990 Location: Undisclosed Location
|
RichardAwesome wrote:Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart wrote:RichardAwesome wrote:Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart wrote:tpractice wrote:
I'm going to call you on this one Dick. Look at the number of Democrats that voted against this. If the Democrats really wanted this to pass, they could have done it anytime they wanted(they only needed about 12 more votes).
Democratic
140
95
Republican
65
133
1
Independent
205
228
1
Yeah, the deal going in was that it had to be bipartisan. If the Democrats wanted to they probably could of shaken an additional 12 votes, but by the time it became apparent that they were necessary it was clear that McCain failed to deliver his House faction there was no way out except to either own it or let it die. I think letting it die was obviously the better choice politically so I'm not surprised that's how it wound up, they are politicians and in the apportionment of blame the balance falls with the GOP for failing to deliver (they won serious concessions for their votes and fucking backed out) and with McCain for mucking the thing up by injecting the Prez campaign into an already delicate and messy situation. This thing is a big pile of shit, but at this point a bigtime bailout is the only way out and the only way to have a real bailout is if it is bipartisan. Until the McCain and the GOPers in the House get serious that's not going to happen. Failing to deliver? Look at how many Democrats said no. Are you bad at math? More Republicans voted no than Democrats. Additionally, of the congress people who made public comments from the floor only about 25% of the Democrats who spoke were against the bill, the rest argued for it. On the Republican side it was almost the opposite. Then vote time came and they threw McCain under the bus (after getting most of their stupid concessions, it's totally nuts!). Whatever deal gets worked out next isn't going to be substantively different unless the Democrats do something surprising, which considering what they have to work with and the seriousness of the crisis may be the only way out of this. If all democrats vote yes, this bill passes. If all Republicans vote yes, this bill passes. What's your point? They worked out a bipartisan compromise, McCain's faction double-crossed him and scuttled the bailout. Considering that and that the Republicans voted against it 2-1 despite the efforts of the party leadership (including their fucking Presidential nominee AND President!) it doesn't make sense to blame the Democrats. Razor wrote:Killing people is good therapy.  
|
|
|
Rank: Polio Power!

Groups: {pDs} Member, Registered User
Joined: 8/1/2008 Posts: 658 Points: 81 Location: SoCal
|
Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart wrote:RichardAwesome wrote:Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart wrote:RichardAwesome wrote:Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart wrote:tpractice wrote:
I'm going to call you on this one Dick. Look at the number of Democrats that voted against this. If the Democrats really wanted this to pass, they could have done it anytime they wanted(they only needed about 12 more votes).
Democratic
140
95
Republican
65
133
1
Independent
205
228
1
Yeah, the deal going in was that it had to be bipartisan. If the Democrats wanted to they probably could of shaken an additional 12 votes, but by the time it became apparent that they were necessary it was clear that McCain failed to deliver his House faction there was no way out except to either own it or let it die. I think letting it die was obviously the better choice politically so I'm not surprised that's how it wound up, they are politicians and in the apportionment of blame the balance falls with the GOP for failing to deliver (they won serious concessions for their votes and fucking backed out) and with McCain for mucking the thing up by injecting the Prez campaign into an already delicate and messy situation. This thing is a big pile of shit, but at this point a bigtime bailout is the only way out and the only way to have a real bailout is if it is bipartisan. Until the McCain and the GOPers in the House get serious that's not going to happen. Failing to deliver? Look at how many Democrats said no. Are you bad at math? More Republicans voted no than Democrats. Additionally, of the congress people who made public comments from the floor only about 25% of the Democrats who spoke were against the bill, the rest argued for it. On the Republican side it was almost the opposite. Then vote time came and they threw McCain under the bus (after getting most of their stupid concessions, it's totally nuts!). Whatever deal gets worked out next isn't going to be substantively different unless the Democrats do something surprising, which considering what they have to work with and the seriousness of the crisis may be the only way out of this. If all democrats vote yes, this bill passes. If all Republicans vote yes, this bill passes. What's your point? They worked out a bipartisan compromise, McCain's faction double-crossed him and scuttled the bailout. Considering that and that the Republicans voted against it 2-1 despite the efforts of the party leadership (including their fucking Presidential nominee AND President!) it doesn't make sense to blame the Democrats. And clearly it was a bipartisan denial of a bad bill.
|
|
|
| Users browsing this topic |
|
Guest
|