6 Pages «<456
VT Shooting Options
Crass
#76 Posted: : Wednesday, April 25, 2007 5:19:07 PM
Rank: Fecal Impaction For the Win!


Groups: {pDs} Member

Joined: 6/8/2006
Posts: 1,525
Points: 9
Location: US

Yea... before we were inturpted by jemima... We were talking about how this wouldn't happen or would happen in forign countries...

Well I would just liek to say that I had a first hand view on gun in England and I am sure anyone who had passed through would agree.

British police do not have guns, nor are guns legal.. So the average person, ignorent, would think that this means no violence. Well that is the way it would apear. But as I was saying if you pass through any part of britain you will see many guns, just not in the hands of police, that is because in Britan the people with the guns are "military" that play the role of  police. Just a thought, which one seems more sinister A pistol (american cops) Or a fully automatic rifle (British "military"


FREE TONY!


Rofl I win!
UncleJemima
#77 Posted: : Wednesday, April 25, 2007 6:51:36 PM
Rank: Advanced Member


Groups: Registered User

Joined: 1/17/2007
Posts: 89
Points: 0
Location: itsa sekkrit
Who agrees with the Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-Free_School_Zones_Act
By making schools free of guns in the hands of law abiding citizens, the only people who have guns in these areas are criminals.  When some nutjob goes apeshit like we have seen a number of times, no one has any ability to end the threat using deadly force of their own.  These "Gun Free Zones" basically become shooting galleries because the shooter can be fairly confident no one will return fire (until the cops show up).  If more people were allowed to carry concealed weapons, these attacks would drop or at least take fewer lives.

When your sig takes up more space than your entire post, you know you are badass
Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart
#78 Posted: : Wednesday, April 25, 2007 9:32:01 PM
Rank: Coathanger Abortion



Groups: {pDs} Member, Server Admin

Joined: 5/17/2006
Posts: 3,487
Points: 1,990
Location: Undisclosed Location
UncleJemima wrote:
Who agrees with the Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-Free_School_Zones_Act


On balance I think it is better to have schools as gun free zones than to not. Mass shootings like this are extremely rare. The benefit outweighs the drawbacks.
Razor wrote:
Killing people is good therapy.


Gazzic
#79 Posted: : Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:06:17 PM
Rank: You're gonna stick that where?



Groups: {pDs} Member

Joined: 5/9/2006
Posts: 316
Points: 75
Location: In your basement.
Here in Canada we don't have people carrying around guns in our schools, yet in comparison with the United States we have far fewer incidents of mass killings within our school system (and gun crimes in-general). That is not to say that it doesn't happen, but relative to the United States the frequency is much lower. 

The enforcement of law should be left to the authorities. IMO handing out guns to citizens (this case students) would only increase the probability of an incident occurring.  In regards to the VT shooting, the second incident (where the majority of people were killed/wounded) could have been easily avoided if the authorities had the hindsight to close down the rest of the campus. Unfortunately, this step was taken in the two hour window of opportunity they had between the first and second incidents.

Yes, if a student had a gun they may have prevented Cho from doing the damage that he did, but you need to think about this for a second.

-College students are in a high stressed environment. Papers and exams, especially at this time of year, take over a students schedule. Should you be giving people under this kind of stress weapons? 

-College students tend to have fun and party to deal with the high levels of stress that come with university/college life. This often leads to people getting drunk, and that can often lead to arguments or fights. Do you want drunk hostile college students to have guns?

-Would a student (with a gun) have the mindset to pull his gun if another student was shooting up the school. In all likelihood they would be unprepared for the confrontation, and would react by running rather than shooting the suspect.

Let me close by saying, you can't lay the blame on an entire ethnic group or culture for what was clearly the actions of one individual. Cho was a American, a American that was suffering from mental illness and depression. This incident does not transcend borders.

p.s.

It should be noted that numerous victims in the VT shooting were visible minorities.
Apollo
#80 Posted: : Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:12:51 PM
Rank: You're gonna stick that where?


Groups: {pDs} Member

Joined: 6/7/2006
Posts: 457
Points: 0
Location: In bed

Gazzic wrote:
Here in Canada we don't have people carrying around guns in our schools, yet in comparison with the United States we have far fewer incidents of mass killings within our school system (and gun crimes in-general). That is not to say that it doesn't happen, but relative to the United States the frequency is much lower. 

The enforcement of law should be left to the authorities. IMO handing out guns to citizens (this case students) would only increase the probability of an incident occurring.  In regards to the VT shooting, the second incident (where the majority of people were killed/wounded) could have been easily avoided if the authorities had the hindsight to close down the rest of the campus. Unfortunately, this step was taken in the two hour window of opportunity they had between the first and second incidents.

Yes, if a student had a gun they may have prevented Cho from doing the damage that he did, but you need to think about this for a second.

-College students are in a high stressed environment. Papers and exams, especially at this time of year, take over a students schedule. Should you be giving people under this kind of stress weapons? 

-College students tend to have fun and party to deal with the high levels of stress that come with university/college life. This often leads to people getting drunk, and that can often lead to arguments or fights. Do you want drunk hostile college students to have guns?

-Would a student (with a gun) have the mindset to pull his gun if another student was shooting up the school. In all likelihood they would be unprepared for the confrontation, and would react by running rather than shooting the suspect.

Let me close by saying, you can't lay the blame on an entire ethnic group or culture for what was clearly the actions of one individual. Cho was a American, a American that was suffering from mental illness and depression. This incident does not transcend borders.

p.s.

It should be noted that numerous victims in the VT shooting were visible minorities.


stealth wrote:
My favorite quote from that entire thing: "..Battles based on battles that actually occurred in Japanese history.. So here's this giant enemy crab.."


UncleJemima
#81 Posted: : Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:16:08 AM
Rank: Advanced Member


Groups: Registered User

Joined: 1/17/2007
Posts: 89
Points: 0
Location: itsa sekkrit
Gazzic wrote:
The enforcement of law should be left to the authorities. IMO handing out guns to citizens (this case students) would only increase the probability of an incident occurring.


Sorry, I completely boobed my intended thought.  In my head I was thinking about shootings in high schools.  I meant allowing teachers/administrators/faculty/etc to be strapped.  I didn't mean students could be packing heat.  Of course these people would have to pass all the mandatory tests like anyone else getting a CCW (concealed carry weapon permit) and possibly even more stringent.  Background checks and maybe psychological testing.  This would be similar to the debate over whether or not commercial airplane pilots should be armed.  Discuss!

When your sig takes up more space than your entire post, you know you are badass
MakeSureItsCharcoalGrilled
#82 Posted: : Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:24:29 AM
Rank: Medium-Well


Groups: Registered User

Joined: 5/9/2006
Posts: 2,411
Points: -2
Location: the bottom of the bottle...
UncleJemima wrote:
Gazzic wrote:
The enforcement of law should be left to the authorities. IMO handing out guns to citizens (this case students) would only increase the probability of an incident occurring.


This would be similar to the debate over whether or not commercial airplane pilots should be armed.  Discuss!


no, it's very very different. Pilots are largely removed from the passangers and don't relaly have to deal with them on a regular basis, i.e. they are much less likely to get stressed and fslah the gun. plus the lives of the passangers depend on them, very different to the role of a teacher.

teachers on the other hand.... very different scenario, having to deal with unruly students, getting stressed etc. i have seen many teachers come as close to a mental breakdown as one can, and i've had some get very agressive with me personally. teachers are among the last group of people in the planet i'd want to see armed, some of them are hardly able to control themselves when they lose it. i could see many an "accident" occurring if teachers were made carry guns.
yeah, i'm a cranky 'oul fucker. deal with it.
UncleJemima
#83 Posted: : Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:27:08 AM
Rank: Advanced Member


Groups: Registered User

Joined: 1/17/2007
Posts: 89
Points: 0
Location: itsa sekkrit
Gazzic wrote:

It should be noted that numerous victims in the VT shooting were visible minorities.


I just looked at a yahoo news page that had pics of the murdered VT students and faculty.  I counted 9 (of 32) non-gringos.  Is there some discussion of the victims being chosen due to their race?  I didn't check into the non-fatal shooting victims.  I figured he just pointed and clicked off rounds randomly.

When your sig takes up more space than your entire post, you know you are badass
UncleJemima
#84 Posted: : Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:33:02 AM
Rank: Advanced Member


Groups: Registered User

Joined: 1/17/2007
Posts: 89
Points: 0
Location: itsa sekkrit
MakeSureItsCharcoalGrilled wrote:

no, it's very very different. Pilots are largely removed from the passangers and don't relaly have to deal with them on a regular basis, i.e. they are much less likely to get stressed and fslah the gun. plus the lives of the passangers depend on them, very different to the role of a teacher.

teachers on the other hand.... very different scenario, having to deal with unruly students, getting stressed etc. i have seen many teachers come as close to a mental breakdown as one can, and i've had some get very agressive with me personally. teachers are among the last group of people in the planet i'd want to see armed, some of them are hardly able to control themselves when they lose it. i could see many an "accident" occurring if teachers were made carry guns.


I have looked into the CCW rules and regulations a bit.  You can easily lose your permit and face stiff penalties for drawing your weapon when deadly force is not required.  Teachers would have the option and not be forced.  If a teacher pulled a gun on a student who didn't pose an immediate threat they would be fired and arrested.  Even the mafia (teacher union) couldn't argue against that.

When your sig takes up more space than your entire post, you know you are badass
Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart
#85 Posted: : Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:55:12 AM
Rank: Coathanger Abortion



Groups: {pDs} Member, Server Admin

Joined: 5/17/2006
Posts: 3,487
Points: 1,990
Location: Undisclosed Location
I can think of three different times when I was in school that I saw a teacher flip out and have a breakdown. If they had a gun there probably would of been a lot of dead children. Arming teachers is fucking insane.
Razor wrote:
Killing people is good therapy.


Gazzic
#86 Posted: : Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:43:46 PM
Rank: You're gonna stick that where?



Groups: {pDs} Member

Joined: 5/9/2006
Posts: 316
Points: 75
Location: In your basement.
I've had teachers that have had nervous break downs during class.  Not sure if I'd want them to have guns, although I can see your point.
UncleJemima
#87 Posted: : Thursday, April 26, 2007 2:36:39 PM
Rank: Advanced Member


Groups: Registered User

Joined: 1/17/2007
Posts: 89
Points: 0
Location: itsa sekkrit
Don't let the crazy teachers have gun permits.  Not all teachers are crazy.  I am just saying something could be done to make it harder for people like this to kill a bunch of innocent people.  Do you know how fast someone with a little self-defense weapons training could take down some unskilled person with 2 small calibre handguns?  Dirty Harry should've been a teacher.  "The most powerful handgun in the world.."

Am I the only one who sees the sad irony in gun-free zones?  It is like gun control laws in general.  The only people who follow the rules are the law-abiding citizens.  A criminal isn't going to care about what is legal and what isn't.  A sick fuck going on a deadly rampage at a school isn't going to think twice about breaking a gun-free zone law.  Gun control laws punish the good people and make things easier for criminals.

When your sig takes up more space than your entire post, you know you are badass
Dick Cheney's Mechanical Heart
#88 Posted: : Thursday, April 26, 2007 3:31:27 PM
Rank: Coathanger Abortion



Groups: {pDs} Member, Server Admin

Joined: 5/17/2006
Posts: 3,487
Points: 1,990
Location: Undisclosed Location
The tradeoffs suck though. It's absurd to say "well don't give the teachers who have breakdowns guns", you don't know who will have a breakdown, and even in the case where someone is crazy (like Cho) the background check system doesn't work very well. You can arm everyone but you're going to end up with more shootings in schools. I'd rather less guns in schools and the occasional shooting rampage that can only be stopped by police (or suicide in the case of Cho or the Columbine killers) than arm all the teachers and hope that they are all good shots, don't flip out themselves, etc. This isn't even getting into the incredible legal liability and fiscal cost involved with arming teachers. As it is now, if someone has a gun in a school and they are not a police officer you know immediately that something is fucked. If it became normal for people to walk around with guns then it becomes less clear when something is fucked. As an example, I am not used to random methhead rednecks walking around with handguns in convenience stores. So when I did see one my first response was to become extremely concerned for everyones safety. In fact this was totally normal because I was in Arizona at the time and they let methheads carry guns wherever they want there.Fortunately, the guy just bought his beer and chewing tobacco and cruised off in his truck without shooting anyone. The same principle applies at schools, you won't know you're fucked until the bullets start flying. 

Probably the most feasible way to prevent mass shootings like this from happening, without even involving guns or anything else really contentious, would be to better fund the mental healthcare system and give mental healthcare professionals and local judiciaries more authority to get involved in the wellbeing of crazy people. It may have stopped Cho if he could have been evaluated for a longer period of time, or if he could have been involuntarily committed, or if the DA could have prosecuted him for stalking without the active cooperation of the victim.

In a nation full of guns and crazy people it's inevitable that crazy people will use guns. Mitigating the use of guns by crazy people by handing out guns to teachers seems like one of the worst solutions imaginable to me. Cops have a hard enough time with their own guns, teachers with guns would be such a complete disaster.
Razor wrote:
Killing people is good therapy.


Users browsing this topic
Guest
6 Pages «<456
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.